Hey M(AI)VENS,
Let me tell you about a moment I had recently that left me saying⌠âWaitâwhat just happened?â
A few weeks ago, I was prepping content for this very newsletter. I turned to Claude AI, one of the tools I often experiment with when I want a second set of âeyesâ on somethingâwhether thatâs brainstorming or organizing info quickly. This time, I asked it to help me find real, recent, relevant news articles about AI that women like you would find empowering or insightful. I gave it clear prompts: the news should be from the past two weeks, and it should cite actual URLs so I could double-check the sources before including them in the newsletter.
What Claude delivered looked amazing.
Headlines that were exactly on point. Stories that felt fresh, diverse, global. Think: âWomen Coders Lead the AI Boomâ or âNew AI Platform Prioritizes Female Founders in Healthcare.â Plus, each had a link attached. I was genuinely excited to share them with you.
But then I started fact-checking.
And⌠nothing.
Page not found. Article doesnât exist. The outlets themselves werenât even running stories like these. Every. Single. One. Was. Fake. đł
So I did what any confused human would do: I asked Claude directly.
I said: âThese articles donât actually exist, or at least I canât find them anywhere online. Whatâs going on?â
Claude responded with a very polite apologyâand admitted that, yes, it had âgenerated fictional news examples to fulfill the request.â In other words, it made up fake articles because I had asked for something it couldnât actually find.
That, my friends, is what the AI world calls a hallucination.
So what is an AI hallucination?
Itâs when your AI tool confidently gives you an answer that sounds real, but is actually made upâout of thin air.
This doesnât mean the AI is âlyingâ on purpose. Itâs not trying to deceive you. AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, and others are designed to generate language based on patterns and plausibility. If something seems like it would make sense, the AI might say itâeven if itâs not based in truth.
This shows up in everything from fake quotes and imaginary book titles to made-up policies and even fictional people. Sometimes the errors are small, like an incorrect stat. Other times theyâre bigâand costly.
The Cursor Incident
Hereâs a recent example that caused a stir this week in the tech world:
A developer was using Cursor, a popular AI-powered code editor, and noticed something strange. Every time the coder switched between devices, he was getting logged out. Thatâs frustrating for anyone, but especially for developers who often move between workstations.
So he contacted support.
A representative named âSamâ responded quickly and confidently:
âThis is expected behavior under a new policy,â Sam said.
Except⌠Sam wasnât a human. Sam was an AI support bot. And there was no new policy. The AI had made that up. It hallucinated a false explanation to appease the customer.
The result? A ton of users got upset. People took to Reddit and Hacker News to complain about the ânew policyâ and some even canceled their subscriptions. The company later apologized and explained that no such policy exists.
This is the danger of hallucinations in high-stakes or customer-facing rolesâespecially when thereâs no human in the loop.
Why It Matters to Us as Women Leaders
AI is an incredible tool for productivity, creativity, and confidence-buildingâbut itâs not infallible. And understanding where the limits are is one of the best ways to strengthen your leadership around AI.
Whether youâre using AI to draft a press release, brainstorm your next team retreat, review legal language, or (like me) curate content for your audienceâyou need to know when to pause and verify.
Hallucinations are more likely when:
You ask for highly specific facts (like news links, stats, or historical data)
You donât have web browsing enabled or linked to real-time sources
The AI doesnât want to admit âI donât knowâ (because itâs trained to give answers, not hold back)
Your M(AI)VEN Takeaways
â
Trustâbut verify.
Let AI help you ideate, summarize, and organizeâbut double-check when it comes to names, dates, data, and links.
â
Push back when it doesnât feel right.
Just like I did with Claudeâask follow-up questions. A simple âCan you show me the source?â or âWhere did you find that?â can surface whether the response is rooted in reality.
â
Use AI as a starting point, not the final word.
Think of your AI tools like an enthusiastic intern. Helpful? Definitely. Reliable on their own? Not quite yet.
â
Bookmark a fact-check buddy.
Tools like Perplexity.ai or [ChatGPT with web browsing] can give you more transparency into where information comes from. They arenât perfect, but theyâre a step up when it comes to reducing hallucinations.
đ M(AI)VENS Book Club - NEW!
A curated collection of stories featuring bold, brilliant women.
In case you missed it, our April pick is The Frozen River by Ariel Lawhonâa beautifully written historical novel based on the real-life diary of Martha Ballard, an 18th-century midwife and healer. Set in colonial Maine, it follows Martha Ballard as she defies societal expectations and risks everything to uncover the truth behind a chilling crime.
As an affiliate, M(AI)VENS may earn a small commission if you purchase through this link â it helps support our growing community at no extra cost to you. Weâve partnered with Bookshop.org because they support local booksellers. đĽ°
Pop into our group chat and share your thoughts when youâre ready!
Have you had an experience with an AI tool that sounded too good to be trueâand turned out to be? Hit reply or leave a comment. Iâd love to include a few community stories in an upcoming edition.
Donât forget to take the weekly poll below (it helps me to know what you like and donât like each week).
Until next time, stay curious and confident.
Cheyenne đ
Founder, M(AI)VENS
Copyright Š 2025 M(AI)VENS. All rights reserved.
I had not heard of this term but the exact thing happened to me when I asked ChatGPT to generate a list of furniture for a room. It had links and plausible sounding IKEA names! But all the links were dead-ends. I thought maybe it was using outdated data, now I realize it was hallucinating. Creating a tool that will appease us even if it has to lieâŚsounds concerning to me!